AI Maturity Team Edition · sample report
What the debrief is built on.
This is the aggregated report for a fictional 19-person leadership group and their teams. The perception-gap columns are the part clients talk about for weeks.
Team report · sample
Halcyon Group, People & Operations (fictional)
19
respondents (6 leaders, 13 team)
Emerging
overall maturity stage
3
dimensions with a material leader-team gap
Guardrail flag: adoption is outrunning governance. Task automation scores Managed while Governance & Guardrails and Oversight sit at Emerging, and the team rates both far lower than leaders do. The people closest to the work can see the gap; the people accountable for it cannot. That is the first agenda item of the debrief.
Maturity by dimension, leaders versus team
Dark marker: leaders' mean · teal marker: team's mean · 1 Ad hoc → 5 Deliberate
One move per gap
Governance & Guardrails (gap 1.6). Publish the rules that already exist informally: what AI may touch, what it may not, and who decides exceptions. The team is guessing, and guessing conservatively costs you adoption.
Oversight & Verification (gap 1.3). Leaders believe review happens; the team reports it mostly does not. Define the review gates by consequence and make them visible.
Culture & Psychological Safety (gap 1.5). The team does not believe disclosure is safe. Until unapproved AI use can be discussed without consequence, every other number in this report is understated.
Get this for your organisation → See the Reality Check Pro sample instead