Reality Check Pro · sample report
What you get back.
This is the aggregated team report, exactly as delivered, for a fictional 14-person team. Your report carries your data and your team's names on the cover.
Team report · sample
Meridian Customer Operations (fictional)
14
responses
2.6
overall position (1 AI-reliant · 5 human-led)
61%
of answers in or beside the wise zone
Guardrail flag: automation is running ahead of oversight. This team automates heavily (1.8) while verification sits well below its wise zone (2.6). That combination is where AI incidents come from.
Dimension picture
Teal band: team spread · dark marker: team mean · teal marker: wise zone
Where to act first
1. Oversight & Verification (mean 2.6, wise zone Human-led). Define review gates by consequence: what must always be verified, by whom, and what evidence lets a gate step down.
2. Problem Framing (mean 2.9, wise zone Human-led). Reinstate a human framing step before AI enters: what is the problem, for whom, and what would good look like.
3. Coordination (mean 1.9, wise zone Augmented). Add one norm to handoffs: label what is AI-drafted and what a human has verified.
Profile mix
The Over-Automator ×5 · The Tech-Leaner ×4 · The Intentional Integrator ×3 · The Human Capability Advocate ×2. The spread itself is a finding: half this team delegates faster than the other half trusts, on the same workflows.
Get this for your team → Measuring readiness instead? Team Edition